Today's Articles

  • OT: Bush's Popularity Reaches New Low — "several pillars of Bush's presidency have begun to crumble"

    Question:

    washingtonpost.com Bush’s Popularity Reaches New Low 58 Percent in Poll Question His Integrity By Richard Morin and Dan Balz Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, November 4, 2005; A01 For the first time in his presidency a majority of Americans question the integrity of President Bush, and growing doubts about his leadership have left him with record negative ratings on the economy, Iraq and even the war on terrorism, a new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows. On almost every key measure of presidential character and performance, the survey found that Bush has never been less popular with the American people. Currently 39 percent approve of the job he is doing as president, while 60 percent disapprove of his performance in office — the highest level of disapproval ever recorded for Bush in Post-ABC polls. Virtually the only possible bright spot for Bush in the survey was generally favorable, if not quite enthusiastic, early reaction to his latest Supreme Court nominee, Samuel A. Alito Jr. Half of Americans say Alito should be confirmed by the Senate, and less than a third view him as too conservative, the poll found. Overall, the survey underscores how several pillars of Bush’s presidency have begun to crumble under the combined weight of events and White House mistakes. Bush’s approval ratings have been in decline for months, but on issues of personal trust, honesty and values, Bush has suffered some of his most notable declines. Moreover, Bush has always retained majority support on his handling of the U.S. campaign against terrorism — until now, when 51 percent have registered disapproval. The CIA leak case has apparently contributed to a withering decline in how Americans view Bush personally. The survey found that 40 percent now view him as honest and trustworthy — a 13 percentage point drop in the past 18 months. Nearly 6 in 10 — 58 percent — said they have doubts about Bush’s honesty, the first time in his presidency that more than half the country has questioned his personal integrity. The indictment Friday of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney’s former chief of staff, in the CIA leak case added to the burden of an administration already reeling from a failed Supreme Court nomination, public dissatisfaction with the economy and continued bloodshed in Iraq. According to the survey, 52 percent say the charges against Libby signal the presence of deeper ethical wrongdoing in the administration. Half believe White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, the president’s top political hand, also did something wrong in the case — about 6 in 10 say Rove should resign. Beyond the leak case, Americans give the administration low scores on ethics, according to the survey, with 67 percent rating the administration negatively on handling ethical matters, while just 32 percent give the administration positive marks. Four in 10 — 43 percent — say the level of ethics and honesty in the federal government has fallen during Bush’s presidency, while 17 percent say it has risen. Faced with its cascade of recent setbacks, the White House is hoping the latest court nomination can rally disaffected conservatives and score the president a victory akin to the one he enjoyed in the nomination of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Alito begins the confirmation process with the support of 49 percent of the public, while 29 percent say he should not be confirmed, the poll found. One in 5 Americans — 22 percent — did not yet know enough about him to make a judgment. The dissatisfaction with Bush flows in part out of broad concerns about the overall direction of the country. Nearly 7 in 10 — 68 percent — believe the country is seriously off course, while only 30 percent are optimistic, the lowest level in more than nine years. Only 3 in 10 express high levels of confidence in Bush, while half say they have little or no confidence in this administration. Just 35 percent of those surveyed rated the economy as either excellent or good, with 65 percent describing it as not so good or poor. Although the government reported last week that gross domestic product rose 3.8 percent in the last quarter, despite the effects of Hurricane Katrina, 29 percent of those surveyed said they regard the economy as poor, the highest recorded during Bush’s presidency. Attitudes toward Bush are sharply polarized by party, as they have been throughout his presidency. Almost 8 in 10 — 78 percent — of Republicans support the president, while just 11 percent of Democrats rate him positively. Republicans long have been the key to Bush’s overall strength, but Bush has suffered some defections since the beginning of the year, when 91 percent approved of the way he was handling his job. Among independents, Bush’s approval has plummeted since the beginning of the year. In the latest poll, 33 percent of independents approved of his performance, while 66 percent disapproved. In January, independents were evenly divided, with 49 percent approving and an equal percentage disapproving. The intensity of Bush’s support has changed since his reelection a year ago, with opponents deepening their hostility toward the administration. In the latest survey, 47 percent said they strongly disapprove of the way he was performing in office, compared with 35 percent who expressed strong disapproval in January. At the same time, the percentage who say they strongly approve of his performance has fallen from 33 percent last January to 20 percent today. Iraq remains a significant drag on Bush’s presidency, with dissatisfaction over the situation there continuing to grow and with suspicion rising over whether administration officials misled the country in the run-up to the invasion more than two years ago. Nearly two-thirds disapprove of the way Bush is handling the situation there, while barely a third approve, a new low. Six in 10 now believe the United States was wrong to invade Iraq, a seven-point increase in just over two months, with almost half the country saying they strongly believe it was wrong. About 3 in 4 — 73 percent — say there have been an unacceptable level of casualties in Iraq. More than half — 52 percent — say the war with Iraq has not contributed to the long-term security of the United States. The same percentage — 52 percent — says the United States should keep its military forces in Iraq until civil order is restored, and only about 1 in 5 — 18 percent — say the United States should withdraw its forces immediately. In the week after U.S. deaths in Iraq passed the 2,000 mark, a majority of those surveyed — 55 percent — said the United States is not making significant progress toward stabilizing the country. The war has taken a toll on the administration’s credibility: A clear majority — 55 percent — now says the administration deliberately misled the country in making its case for war with Iraq — a conflict that an even larger majority say is not worth the cost. The president’s handling of terrorism was widely regarded among strategists as the key to his winning a second term last year. But questions about Bush’s effectiveness on other fronts have also depreciated this asset. His 48 percent approval now compares with 61 percent approval on this issue at the time of his second inauguration, down from a 2004 high of 66 percent. Bush also set new lows in the latest Post-ABC News poll for his management of the economy, where disapproval topped 60 percent for the first time in his presidency. And 6 in 10 are critical of the way Bush is dealing with health care — a double-digit increase since March. On gasoline prices, Bush’s numbers have increased slightly over the past two months but still remain highly negative, with just 26 percent rating him positively. The survey suggests a rapidly widening gulf between Bush and the American people. Two in 3 say Bush does not understand the problems of people like them, a 10 percentage point increase since January. Nearly 6 in 10 — 58 percent — doubt Bush shares their values, while 40 percent say he does, another new low for this president. For the first time since he took office, fewer than half — 47 percent — said Bush is a strong leader, and Americans divided equally over whether Bush can be trusted in a crisis. Told of the poll results, Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman said Bush will rally support through such issues as education reform, changes to the tax code, and a new energy strategy to show the public that he "will continue to push for changes in our government to serve the American people." A total of 1,202 randomly selected adults were interviewed Oct. 30-Nov. 2 for this survey. Margin of sampling error for the overall results is plus or minus three percentage points. _____ Assistant polling director Claudia Deane contributed to this report.


  • OT: Bush's Popularity Reaches New Low — "several pillars of Bush's presidency have begun to crumble"

    Question:

    washingtonpost.com Bush’s Popularity Reaches New Low 58 Percent in Poll Question His Integrity By Richard Morin and Dan Balz Washington Post Staff Writers Friday, November 4, 2005; A01 For the first time in his presidency a majority of Americans question the integrity of President Bush, and growing doubts about his leadership have left him with record negative ratings on the economy, Iraq and even the war on terrorism, a new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows. On almost every key measure of presidential character and performance, the survey found that Bush has never been less popular with the American people. Currently 39 percent approve of the job he is doing as president, while 60 percent disapprove of his performance in office — the highest level of disapproval ever recorded for Bush in Post-ABC polls. Virtually the only possible bright spot for Bush in the survey was generally favorable, if not quite enthusiastic, early reaction to his latest Supreme Court nominee, Samuel A. Alito Jr. Half of Americans say Alito should be confirmed by the Senate, and less than a third view him as too conservative, the poll found. Overall, the survey underscores how several pillars of Bush’s presidency have begun to crumble under the combined weight of events and White House mistakes. Bush’s approval ratings have been in decline for months, but on issues of personal trust, honesty and values, Bush has suffered some of his most notable declines. Moreover, Bush has always retained majority support on his handling of the U.S. campaign against terrorism — until now, when 51 percent have registered disapproval. The CIA leak case has apparently contributed to a withering decline in how Americans view Bush personally. The survey found that 40 percent now view him as honest and trustworthy — a 13 percentage point drop in the past 18 months. Nearly 6 in 10 — 58 percent — said they have doubts about Bush’s honesty, the first time in his presidency that more than half the country has questioned his personal integrity. The indictment Friday of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney’s former chief of staff, in the CIA leak case added to the burden of an administration already reeling from a failed Supreme Court nomination, public dissatisfaction with the economy and continued bloodshed in Iraq. According to the survey, 52 percent say the charges against Libby signal the presence of deeper ethical wrongdoing in the administration. Half believe White House Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove, the president’s top political hand, also did something wrong in the case — about 6 in 10 say Rove should resign. Beyond the leak case, Americans give the administration low scores on ethics, according to the survey, with 67 percent rating the administration negatively on handling ethical matters, while just 32 percent give the administration positive marks. Four in 10 — 43 percent — say the level of ethics and honesty in the federal government has fallen during Bush’s presidency, while 17 percent say it has risen. Faced with its cascade of recent setbacks, the White House is hoping the latest court nomination can rally disaffected conservatives and score the president a victory akin to the one he enjoyed in the nomination of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Alito begins the confirmation process with the support of 49 percent of the public, while 29 percent say he should not be confirmed, the poll found. One in 5 Americans — 22 percent — did not yet know enough about him to make a judgment. The dissatisfaction with Bush flows in part out of broad concerns about the overall direction of the country. Nearly 7 in 10 — 68 percent — believe the country is seriously off course, while only 30 percent are optimistic, the lowest level in more than nine years. Only 3 in 10 express high levels of confidence in Bush, while half say they have little or no confidence in this administration. Just 35 percent of those surveyed rated the economy as either excellent or good, with 65 percent describing it as not so good or poor. Although the government reported last week that gross domestic product rose 3.8 percent in the last quarter, despite the effects of Hurricane Katrina, 29 percent of those surveyed said they regard the economy as poor, the highest recorded during Bush’s presidency. Attitudes toward Bush are sharply polarized by party, as they have been throughout his presidency. Almost 8 in 10 — 78 percent — of Republicans support the president, while just 11 percent of Democrats rate him positively. Republicans long have been the key to Bush’s overall strength, but Bush has suffered some defections since the beginning of the year, when 91 percent approved of the way he was handling his job. Among independents, Bush’s approval has plummeted since the beginning of the year. In the latest poll, 33 percent of independents approved of his performance, while 66 percent disapproved. In January, independents were evenly divided, with 49 percent approving and an equal percentage disapproving. The intensity of Bush’s support has changed since his reelection a year ago, with opponents deepening their hostility toward the administration. In the latest survey, 47 percent said they strongly disapprove of the way he was performing in office, compared with 35 percent who expressed strong disapproval in January. At the same time, the percentage who say they strongly approve of his performance has fallen from 33 percent last January to 20 percent today. Iraq remains a significant drag on Bush’s presidency, with dissatisfaction over the situation there continuing to grow and with suspicion rising over whether administration officials misled the country in the run-up to the invasion more than two years ago. Nearly two-thirds disapprove of the way Bush is handling the situation there, while barely a third approve, a new low. Six in 10 now believe the United States was wrong to invade Iraq, a seven-point increase in just over two months, with almost half the country saying they strongly believe it was wrong. About 3 in 4 — 73 percent — say there have been an unacceptable level of casualties in Iraq. More than half — 52 percent — say the war with Iraq has not contributed to the long-term security of the United States. The same percentage — 52 percent — says the United States should keep its military forces in Iraq until civil order is restored, and only about 1 in 5 — 18 percent — say the United States should withdraw its forces immediately. In the week after U.S. deaths in Iraq passed the 2,000 mark, a majority of those surveyed — 55 percent — said the United States is not making significant progress toward stabilizing the country. The war has taken a toll on the administration’s credibility: A clear majority — 55 percent — now says the administration deliberately misled the country in making its case for war with Iraq — a conflict that an even larger majority say is not worth the cost. The president’s handling of terrorism was widely regarded among strategists as the key to his winning a second term last year. But questions about Bush’s effectiveness on other fronts have also depreciated this asset. His 48 percent approval now compares with 61 percent approval on this issue at the time of his second inauguration, down from a 2004 high of 66 percent. Bush also set new lows in the latest Post-ABC News poll for his management of the economy, where disapproval topped 60 percent for the first time in his presidency. And 6 in 10 are critical of the way Bush is dealing with health care — a double-digit increase since March. On gasoline prices, Bush’s numbers have increased slightly over the past two months but still remain highly negative, with just 26 percent rating him positively. The survey suggests a rapidly widening gulf between Bush and the American people. Two in 3 say Bush does not understand the problems of people like them, a 10 percentage point increase since January. Nearly 6 in 10 — 58 percent — doubt Bush shares their values, while 40 percent say he does, another new low for this president. For the first time since he took office, fewer than half — 47 percent — said Bush is a strong leader, and Americans divided equally over whether Bush can be trusted in a crisis. Told of the poll results, Republican National Committee Chairman Ken Mehlman said Bush will rally support through such issues as education reform, changes to the tax code, and a new energy strategy to show the public that he "will continue to push for changes in our government to serve the American people." A total of 1,202 randomly selected adults were interviewed Oct. 30-Nov. 2 for this survey. Margin of sampling error for the overall results is plus or minus three percentage points. _____ Assistant polling director Claudia Deane contributed to this report.


  • Sonolum/Fusion — Green, Future Energy?

    Question:

    > Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson

    Very cool.

    Response:

    > > Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > http://www.tipmagazine.com/tip/INPHFA/vol-9/iss-6/p22.html . > You didn’t ask my opinion, but, tragically, you’re getting it. > If sonofusion turns out to be real, > it will be a development whose importance can hardly be understated.

    What do you require as proof that it’s real?  Tritium works for me. Economical–that’s another story.

    Response:

    > > Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson > Very cool.

    Lively discussion on this at http://www.slashdot.com Overall tone is "remains highly unlikely". — Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics   3860 West First Street  Box 809  Thatcher, AZ 85552 Please visit my GURU’s LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com

    Response:

    > What do you require as proof that it’s real?  Tritium works for me. > Economical–that’s another story.

    For openers, it would have to run on something other than a DeLorean. — Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics   3860 West First Street  Box 809  Thatcher, AZ 85552 Please visit my GURU’s LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com

    Response:

    Nice post hanson but there is a problem. Sonofusion is a form of cold fusion. Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold fusion the US Patent office, acting on advice from nuclear expert Glen T. Seaborg, decided that cold fusion was not real and it will not issue any patent for cold fusion. Hence, no one can profit from cold fusion  and there is virtually no money for research. On the other hand, current US expenditures on global warming esearch amount to $4.3 billion per year. The US patent office does recognize global warming as real and will issue patents that deal with global warming. The only way out of this impass is for the US patent office to reverse itself and to declare that global warming is not real while cold fusion discoveries can be patented. This would provide scientific justification for downsizing of the global warming industry. The $4.3 billion spent on global warming would then be freed up for cold fusion research. Eminent global warming scientists could then be retrained for work on cold fusion.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > The device is a clear glass canister about the height of two coffee mugs stacked > on top of one another. Inside the canister is a liquid called deuterated > acetone. The acetone contains a form of hydrogen called deuterium, or heavy > hydrogen, which contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. Normal > hydrogen contains only one proton in its nucleus. > The researchers expose the clear canister of liquid to pulses of neutrons every > five milliseconds, or thousandths of a second, causing tiny cavities to form. At > the same time, the liquid is bombarded with a specific frequency of ultrasound, > which causes the cavities to form into bubbles that are about 60 nanometers – or > billionths of a meter – in diameter. The bubbles then expand to a much larger > size, about 6,000 microns, or millionths of a meter – large enough to be seen > with the unaided eye. > Within nanoseconds these large bubbles contract with tremendous force, returning > to roughly their original size, and release flashes of light in a well-known > phenomenon known as sonoluminescence. Because the bubbles grow to such a > relatively large size before they implode, their contraction causes extreme > temperatures and pressures comparable to those found in the interiors of stars. > Researches estimate that temperatures inside the imploding bubbles reach 10 > million degrees Celsius and pressures comparable to 1,000 million earth > atmospheres at sea level. > At that point, deuterium atoms fuse together, the same way hydrogen atoms fuse > in stars, releasing neutrons and energy in the process. The process also > releases a type of radiation called gamma rays and a radioactive material called > tritium, all of which have been recorded and measured by the team. In future > versions of the experiment, the tritium produced might then be used as a fuel to > drive energy-producing reactions in which it fuses with deuterium. > The desktop experiment is safe because, although the reactions generate > extremely high pressures and temperatures, those extreme conditions exist only > in small regions of the liquid in the container – within the collapsing bubbles. > One key to the process is the large difference between the original size of the > bubbles and their expanded size. Going from 60 nanometers to 6,000 microns is > about 100,000 times larger, compared to the bubbles usually formed in > sonoluminescence, which grow only about 10 times larger before they implode. > "This means you’ve got about a trillion times more energy potentially available > for compression of the bubbles than you do with conventional sonoluminescence," > Taleyarkhan said. "When the light flashes are emitted, it’s getting extremely > hot, and if your liquid has deuterium atoms compared to ordinary hydrogen atoms, > the conditions are hot enough to produce nuclear fusion." > The ultrasound switches on and off about 20,000 times a second as the liquid is > being bombarded by neutrons. > The researchers compared their results using normal acetone and deuterated > acetone, showing no evidence of fusion in the former. > Each five-millisecond pulse of neutrons is followed by a five-millisecond gap, > during which time the bubbles implode, release light and emit a surge of about 1 > million neutrons per second. > In the first experiments, with the less sophisticated equipment, the team was > only able to collect data during a small portion of the five-millisecond > intervals between neutron pulses. The new equipment enabled the researchers to > see what was happening over the entire course of the experiment. > The data clearly show surges in neutrons emitted in precise timing with the > light flashes, meaning the neutron emissions are produced by the collapsing > bubbles responsible for the flashes of light, Taleyarkhan said. > "We see neutrons being emitted each time the bubble is imploding with sufficient > violence," Taleyarkhan said. > Fusion of deuterium atoms emits neutrons that fall within a specific energy > range of 2.5 mega-electron volts or below, which was the level of energy seen in > neutrons produced in the experiment. The production of tritium also can only be > attributed to fusion, and it was never observed in any of the control > experiments in which normal acetone was used, he said. > Whereas data from the previous experiment had roughly a one in 100 chance of > being attributed to some phenomena other than nuclear fusion, the new, more > precise results represent more like a one in a trillion chance of being wrong, > Taleyarkhan said. > "There is only one way to produce tritium – through nuclear processes," he said. > The results also agree with mathematical theory and modeling. > Future work will focus on studying ways to scale up the device, which is needed > before it could be used in practical applications, and creating portable devices > that operate without the need for the expensive equipment now used to bombard > the canister with pulses of neutrons. > "That takes it to the next level because then it’s a standalone generator," > Taleyarkhan said. "These will be little nuclear reactors by themselves that are > producing neutrons and energy." > Such an advance could lead to the development of extremely accurate portable > detectors that use neutrons for a wide variety of applications. > "If you have a neutron source you can detect virtually anything because neutrons > interact with atomic nuclei in such a way that each material shows a clear-cut > signature," Taleyarkhan said. > The technique also might be used to synthesize materials inexpensively. > "For example, carbon is turned into diamond using extreme heat and temperature > over many years," Taleyarkhan said. "You wouldn’t have to wait years to convert > carbon to diamond. In chemistry, most reactions grow exponentially with temperat > ure. Now we might have a way to synthesize certain chemicals that were otherwise > difficult to do economically. > "Several applications in the field of medicine also appear feasible, such as > tumor treatment." > Before such a system could be used as a new energy source, however, researchers > must reach beyond the "break-even" point, in which more energy is released from > the reaction than the amount of energy it takes to drive the reaction. > "We are not yet at break-even," Taleyarkhan said. "That would be the ultimate. I > don’t know if it will ever happen, but we are hopeful that it will and don’t see > any clear reason why not. In the future we will attempt to scale up this system > and see how far we can go." > Theresa Bourgeois, RPI director of media relations, (518) 276-2840, —— > ABSTRACT > Additional Evidence of nuclear emissions during acoustic cavitation > R.P. Taleyarkhan1, J.S. Cho2, C.D. West3, R. T. Lahey3, Jr., R.I. Nigmatulin4, > and R.C. Block3 > 1Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, 2Oak Ridge Associated > Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, 3Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, > Troy, New York 12180, > 4Russian Academy of Sciences, > 6 Karl Marx Street, Ufa 450000, Russia > Time spectra of neutron and sonoluminescence emissions were measured in > cavitation experiments with chilled deuterated acetone. Statistically > significant neutron and gamma ray emissions were measured with a calibrated > liquid-scintillation detector, and sonoluminescence emissions were measured with > a photomultiplier tube. The neutron emission energy corresponded to <2.5 MeV and > had an emission rate of up to ~4X105 n/s. Measurements of tritium production > were also performed and these data implied a neutron emission rate due to D-D > fusion which agreed with what was measured. In contrast, control experiments > using normal acetone did not result in statistically significant tritium > activity, or neutron or gamma ray emissions.

    Response:

    "Dr. Convection" [aka David Naugler, I presume ?]

    > Nice post, hanson, but there is a problem.

    Thank you. Yes, there are and there will be problems, or we would not harp over them……ahahahaha……which is the fun. > Sonofusion is a form of cold fusion. > Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold > fusion the US Patent office, acting on advice from nuclear expert Glen T. > Seaborg, decided that cold fusion was not real and it will not issue any > patent for cold fusion. Hence, no one can profit from cold fusion  and there > is virtually no money for research. On the other hand, current US > expenditures on global warming esearch amount to $4.3 billion per year. The > US patent office does recognize global warming as real and will issue > patents that deal with global warming. The only way out of this impass is > for the US patent office to reverse itself and to declare that global > warming is not real while cold fusion discoveries can be patented. This > would provide scientific justification for downsizing of the global warming > industry. The $4.3 billion spent on global warming would then be freed up > for cold fusion research. Eminent global warming scientists could then be > retrained for work on cold fusion.

    [hanson] Yo, David, you got my vote on your take!   But, I have no idea how all this is gonna shake out. As you know there’s a lot of talk in the hallways about privatizing the government. 1996 Fee-Demo is a classic. Then I’ve read somewhere that the USPTO is also on the block to be sold/run to the highest bidder. Now, who will determine OFFICIAL agency policy once sold that is anybody’s guess,   BUT money talks. And a good guess is that the private owners of such agencies will have the final say so. Democracy by $$$….ahahahaha… OTOH of the equation what the elected government do with all the money from the sales of their agencies, I have no idea. where everybody told everybody else what to do and finally nobody was It ain’t all that black though, as long as one is clever enough to follow the dollars, and do it……instead of just whining about it, like VD Nudds Sidebar: Bureaucracies have become so big and inefficient ever since WII: the Industrial Military Complex — NASA – EPA – HLS – etc…… Now, there are HUGE $$ in the bureaucratic systems. Lots & lots of games will be played with these immense fortunes.You haven’t seen nothing yet! The Left will blame the Right and the Right will blame the Left, depending on which sits at the rudder and has to cover up its strokes…….ahahahaha.. Will it cause a collapse? NO, NO and NO. All this activity is LIFE,– CHANGE. That’s all!  -  Of course, everybody does believe what makes them happy or UNHAPPY anyway…….ahahahahahahahaa…..AHAAHHAHAHAhhaahhaha…. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > hanson > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > The device is a clear glass canister …. [hit the link for details]

    Response:

    > Nice post hanson but there is a problem. Sonofusion is a form of cold > fusion. Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold > fusion the US Patent office, acting on advice from nuclear expert Glen T. > Seaborg, decided that cold fusion was not real and it will not issue any > patent for cold fusion. Hence, no one can profit from cold fusion  and there > is virtually no money for research.

    Did USPTO make some sort of official decision?  From my understanding, they were only opposed to the particular claims, constructs and plans of Pons and Fleischmann.  Their particular method is the only one (of three now) which turned out to be fraudulent. > On the other hand, current US > expenditures on global warming esearch amount to $4.3 billion per year. The > US patent office does recognize global warming as real and will issue > patents that deal with global warming. The only way out of this impass is > for the US patent office to reverse itself and to declare that global > warming is not real while cold fusion discoveries can be patented. This > would provide scientific justification for downsizing of the global warming > industry. The $4.3 billion spent on global warming would then be freed up > for cold fusion research. Eminent global warming scientists could then be > retrained for work on cold fusion.

    Taleyarkhan et al have managed to swim in the dollars even since their reported failures on the last lap.  I can cheer your viewpoint, but realistically funding is no concern here.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Kick this around, green dudes. > > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > > Hanson > Very cool. > Lively discussion on this at http://www.slashdot.com > Overall tone is "remains highly unlikely".

    I’ll check it out.  I wonder why a respected uniiversity would report the research of their nuclear professor and why he would be studying a dead end.  I’d reserve judgement.

    Response:

    > Nice post hanson but there is a problem. Sonofusion is a form of cold > fusion. Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold

    It is *hot* fusion. — Dirk The Consensus:- The political party for the new millennium http://www.theconsensus.org

    Response:

    > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > > G. R. L. Cowan wrote > > > http://www.tipmagazine.com/tip/INPHFA/vol-9/iss-6/p22.html . > > This ought to be good. > OTOH you can build yourself a Farnsworth fusion reactor > (fusor) quite easily. > Dirk > Yo, Dirk, long time no hear. Que passo, amigo?

    Playing politics in uk.politics.misc We will be standing our first candidates in the local elections here in June. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Here’s some rehash of this item and issue: > Fusor (patent 3,386,883). > http://www.ticnet.com/bertpool/philo/883.htm > containing the following comments: > "While testing high power UHF tubes Farnsworth discovered > an anomalous self


  • Sonolum/Fusion — Green, Future Energy?

    Question:

    > Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson

    Very cool.

    Response:

    > > Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > http://www.tipmagazine.com/tip/INPHFA/vol-9/iss-6/p22.html . > You didn’t ask my opinion, but, tragically, you’re getting it. > If sonofusion turns out to be real, > it will be a development whose importance can hardly be understated.

    What do you require as proof that it’s real?  Tritium works for me. Economical–that’s another story.

    Response:

    > > Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson > Very cool.

    Lively discussion on this at http://www.slashdot.com Overall tone is "remains highly unlikely". — Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics   3860 West First Street  Box 809  Thatcher, AZ 85552 Please visit my GURU’s LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com

    Response:

    > What do you require as proof that it’s real?  Tritium works for me. > Economical–that’s another story.

    For openers, it would have to run on something other than a DeLorean. — Many thanks, Don Lancaster Synergetics   3860 West First Street  Box 809  Thatcher, AZ 85552 Please visit my GURU’s LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com

    Response:

    Nice post hanson but there is a problem. Sonofusion is a form of cold fusion. Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold fusion the US Patent office, acting on advice from nuclear expert Glen T. Seaborg, decided that cold fusion was not real and it will not issue any patent for cold fusion. Hence, no one can profit from cold fusion  and there is virtually no money for research. On the other hand, current US expenditures on global warming esearch amount to $4.3 billion per year. The US patent office does recognize global warming as real and will issue patents that deal with global warming. The only way out of this impass is for the US patent office to reverse itself and to declare that global warming is not real while cold fusion discoveries can be patented. This would provide scientific justification for downsizing of the global warming industry. The $4.3 billion spent on global warming would then be freed up for cold fusion research. Eminent global warming scientists could then be retrained for work on cold fusion.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > Hanson > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > The device is a clear glass canister about the height of two coffee mugs stacked > on top of one another. Inside the canister is a liquid called deuterated > acetone. The acetone contains a form of hydrogen called deuterium, or heavy > hydrogen, which contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. Normal > hydrogen contains only one proton in its nucleus. > The researchers expose the clear canister of liquid to pulses of neutrons every > five milliseconds, or thousandths of a second, causing tiny cavities to form. At > the same time, the liquid is bombarded with a specific frequency of ultrasound, > which causes the cavities to form into bubbles that are about 60 nanometers – or > billionths of a meter – in diameter. The bubbles then expand to a much larger > size, about 6,000 microns, or millionths of a meter – large enough to be seen > with the unaided eye. > Within nanoseconds these large bubbles contract with tremendous force, returning > to roughly their original size, and release flashes of light in a well-known > phenomenon known as sonoluminescence. Because the bubbles grow to such a > relatively large size before they implode, their contraction causes extreme > temperatures and pressures comparable to those found in the interiors of stars. > Researches estimate that temperatures inside the imploding bubbles reach 10 > million degrees Celsius and pressures comparable to 1,000 million earth > atmospheres at sea level. > At that point, deuterium atoms fuse together, the same way hydrogen atoms fuse > in stars, releasing neutrons and energy in the process. The process also > releases a type of radiation called gamma rays and a radioactive material called > tritium, all of which have been recorded and measured by the team. In future > versions of the experiment, the tritium produced might then be used as a fuel to > drive energy-producing reactions in which it fuses with deuterium. > The desktop experiment is safe because, although the reactions generate > extremely high pressures and temperatures, those extreme conditions exist only > in small regions of the liquid in the container – within the collapsing bubbles. > One key to the process is the large difference between the original size of the > bubbles and their expanded size. Going from 60 nanometers to 6,000 microns is > about 100,000 times larger, compared to the bubbles usually formed in > sonoluminescence, which grow only about 10 times larger before they implode. > "This means you’ve got about a trillion times more energy potentially available > for compression of the bubbles than you do with conventional sonoluminescence," > Taleyarkhan said. "When the light flashes are emitted, it’s getting extremely > hot, and if your liquid has deuterium atoms compared to ordinary hydrogen atoms, > the conditions are hot enough to produce nuclear fusion." > The ultrasound switches on and off about 20,000 times a second as the liquid is > being bombarded by neutrons. > The researchers compared their results using normal acetone and deuterated > acetone, showing no evidence of fusion in the former. > Each five-millisecond pulse of neutrons is followed by a five-millisecond gap, > during which time the bubbles implode, release light and emit a surge of about 1 > million neutrons per second. > In the first experiments, with the less sophisticated equipment, the team was > only able to collect data during a small portion of the five-millisecond > intervals between neutron pulses. The new equipment enabled the researchers to > see what was happening over the entire course of the experiment. > The data clearly show surges in neutrons emitted in precise timing with the > light flashes, meaning the neutron emissions are produced by the collapsing > bubbles responsible for the flashes of light, Taleyarkhan said. > "We see neutrons being emitted each time the bubble is imploding with sufficient > violence," Taleyarkhan said. > Fusion of deuterium atoms emits neutrons that fall within a specific energy > range of 2.5 mega-electron volts or below, which was the level of energy seen in > neutrons produced in the experiment. The production of tritium also can only be > attributed to fusion, and it was never observed in any of the control > experiments in which normal acetone was used, he said. > Whereas data from the previous experiment had roughly a one in 100 chance of > being attributed to some phenomena other than nuclear fusion, the new, more > precise results represent more like a one in a trillion chance of being wrong, > Taleyarkhan said. > "There is only one way to produce tritium – through nuclear processes," he said. > The results also agree with mathematical theory and modeling. > Future work will focus on studying ways to scale up the device, which is needed > before it could be used in practical applications, and creating portable devices > that operate without the need for the expensive equipment now used to bombard > the canister with pulses of neutrons. > "That takes it to the next level because then it’s a standalone generator," > Taleyarkhan said. "These will be little nuclear reactors by themselves that are > producing neutrons and energy." > Such an advance could lead to the development of extremely accurate portable > detectors that use neutrons for a wide variety of applications. > "If you have a neutron source you can detect virtually anything because neutrons > interact with atomic nuclei in such a way that each material shows a clear-cut > signature," Taleyarkhan said. > The technique also might be used to synthesize materials inexpensively. > "For example, carbon is turned into diamond using extreme heat and temperature > over many years," Taleyarkhan said. "You wouldn’t have to wait years to convert > carbon to diamond. In chemistry, most reactions grow exponentially with temperat > ure. Now we might have a way to synthesize certain chemicals that were otherwise > difficult to do economically. > "Several applications in the field of medicine also appear feasible, such as > tumor treatment." > Before such a system could be used as a new energy source, however, researchers > must reach beyond the "break-even" point, in which more energy is released from > the reaction than the amount of energy it takes to drive the reaction. > "We are not yet at break-even," Taleyarkhan said. "That would be the ultimate. I > don’t know if it will ever happen, but we are hopeful that it will and don’t see > any clear reason why not. In the future we will attempt to scale up this system > and see how far we can go." > Theresa Bourgeois, RPI director of media relations, (518) 276-2840, —— > ABSTRACT > Additional Evidence of nuclear emissions during acoustic cavitation > R.P. Taleyarkhan1, J.S. Cho2, C.D. West3, R. T. Lahey3, Jr., R.I. Nigmatulin4, > and R.C. Block3 > 1Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, 2Oak Ridge Associated > Universities, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, 3Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, > Troy, New York 12180, > 4Russian Academy of Sciences, > 6 Karl Marx Street, Ufa 450000, Russia > Time spectra of neutron and sonoluminescence emissions were measured in > cavitation experiments with chilled deuterated acetone. Statistically > significant neutron and gamma ray emissions were measured with a calibrated > liquid-scintillation detector, and sonoluminescence emissions were measured with > a photomultiplier tube. The neutron emission energy corresponded to <2.5 MeV and > had an emission rate of up to ~4X105 n/s. Measurements of tritium production > were also performed and these data implied a neutron emission rate due to D-D > fusion which agreed with what was measured. In contrast, control experiments > using normal acetone did not result in statistically significant tritium > activity, or neutron or gamma ray emissions.

    Response:

    "Dr. Convection" [aka David Naugler, I presume ?]

    > Nice post, hanson, but there is a problem.

    Thank you. Yes, there are and there will be problems, or we would not harp over them……ahahahaha……which is the fun. > Sonofusion is a form of cold fusion. > Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold > fusion the US Patent office, acting on advice from nuclear expert Glen T. > Seaborg, decided that cold fusion was not real and it will not issue any > patent for cold fusion. Hence, no one can profit from cold fusion  and there > is virtually no money for research. On the other hand, current US > expenditures on global warming esearch amount to $4.3 billion per year. The > US patent office does recognize global warming as real and will issue > patents that deal with global warming. The only way out of this impass is > for the US patent office to reverse itself and to declare that global > warming is not real while cold fusion discoveries can be patented. This > would provide scientific justification for downsizing of the global warming > industry. The $4.3 billion spent on global warming would then be freed up > for cold fusion research. Eminent global warming scientists could then be > retrained for work on cold fusion.

    [hanson] Yo, David, you got my vote on your take!   But, I have no idea how all this is gonna shake out. As you know there’s a lot of talk in the hallways about privatizing the government. 1996 Fee-Demo is a classic. Then I’ve read somewhere that the USPTO is also on the block to be sold/run to the highest bidder. Now, who will determine OFFICIAL agency policy once sold that is anybody’s guess,   BUT money talks. And a good guess is that the private owners of such agencies will have the final say so. Democracy by $$$….ahahahaha… OTOH of the equation what the elected government do with all the money from the sales of their agencies, I have no idea. where everybody told everybody else what to do and finally nobody was It ain’t all that black though, as long as one is clever enough to follow the dollars, and do it……instead of just whining about it, like VD Nudds Sidebar: Bureaucracies have become so big and inefficient ever since WII: the Industrial Military Complex — NASA – EPA – HLS – etc…… Now, there are HUGE $$ in the bureaucratic systems. Lots & lots of games will be played with these immense fortunes.You haven’t seen nothing yet! The Left will blame the Right and the Right will blame the Left, depending on which sits at the rudder and has to cover up its strokes…….ahahahaha.. Will it cause a collapse? NO, NO and NO. All this activity is LIFE,– CHANGE. That’s all!  -  Of course, everybody does believe what makes them happy or UNHAPPY anyway…….ahahahahahahahaa…..AHAAHHAHAHAhhaahhaha…. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Kick this around, green dudes. > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > hanson > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > The device is a clear glass canister …. [hit the link for details]

    Response:

    > Nice post hanson but there is a problem. Sonofusion is a form of cold > fusion. Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold > fusion the US Patent office, acting on advice from nuclear expert Glen T. > Seaborg, decided that cold fusion was not real and it will not issue any > patent for cold fusion. Hence, no one can profit from cold fusion  and there > is virtually no money for research.

    Did USPTO make some sort of official decision?  From my understanding, they were only opposed to the particular claims, constructs and plans of Pons and Fleischmann.  Their particular method is the only one (of three now) which turned out to be fraudulent. > On the other hand, current US > expenditures on global warming esearch amount to $4.3 billion per year. The > US patent office does recognize global warming as real and will issue > patents that deal with global warming. The only way out of this impass is > for the US patent office to reverse itself and to declare that global > warming is not real while cold fusion discoveries can be patented. This > would provide scientific justification for downsizing of the global warming > industry. The $4.3 billion spent on global warming would then be freed up > for cold fusion research. Eminent global warming scientists could then be > retrained for work on cold fusion.

    Taleyarkhan et al have managed to swim in the dollars even since their reported failures on the last lap.  I can cheer your viewpoint, but realistically funding is no concern here.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Kick this around, green dudes. > > This seems to be a clever combination of known technologies. > > What do you say? This guys deserves the green from his permit > > charges and user fees, if it works out on an industrial scale. > > Hanson > Very cool. > Lively discussion on this at http://www.slashdot.com > Overall tone is "remains highly unlikely".

    I’ll check it out.  I wonder why a respected uniiversity would report the research of their nuclear professor and why he would be studying a dead end.  I’d reserve judgement.

    Response:

    > Nice post hanson but there is a problem. Sonofusion is a form of cold > fusion. Some time after Pons and Fleischmann announced their form of cold

    It is *hot* fusion. — Dirk The Consensus:- The political party for the new millennium http://www.theconsensus.org

    Response:

    > http://news.uns.purdue.edu/html4ever/2004/0400302.Taleyarkhan.fusion…. > > G. R. L. Cowan wrote > > > http://www.tipmagazine.com/tip/INPHFA/vol-9/iss-6/p22.html . > > This ought to be good. > OTOH you can build yourself a Farnsworth fusion reactor > (fusor) quite easily. > Dirk > Yo, Dirk, long time no hear. Que passo, amigo?

    Playing politics in uk.politics.misc We will be standing our first candidates in the local elections here in June. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Here’s some rehash of this item and issue: > Fusor (patent 3,386,883). > http://www.ticnet.com/bertpool/philo/883.htm > containing the following comments: > "While testing high power UHF tubes Farnsworth discovered > an anomalous self


  • Jacques Chirac and taking the high moral ground

    Question:

    > >>Lemme guess … is the same ’source’ that claimed just before this >>unlawful war of aggression, that France had been selling helicopter and >>fighter aircraft parts to Iraq ? >>I have to laugh.   > I guess this is a lie also? > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/international/europe/30CND-FRAN.htm… > No you idiot, that’s a finding of a French court.  It’s what we call > ‘reliable’.  Unlike the anti-French, worthy-of-New-York-Post, propaganda > posted to this thread.

    "New York Post Propaganda" I wonder what reporter Alain Hertoghe might say to this assertion…. jay Sat Jan 31, 2004

    Response:

    > "New York Post Propaganda" > I wonder what reporter Alain Hertoghe might say to this assertion….

    I guess that’s indeed where he belongs…

    Response:

    > > "New York Post Propaganda" > I wonder what reporter Alain Hertoghe might say to this assertion…. > I guess that’s indeed where he belongs…

    Alas, it is only the BBC that seems to need replacement staff now. jay Sat Jan 31, 2004

    Response:

    >Alas, it is only the BBC that seems to need replacement staff now. >jay >Sat Jan 31, 2004

    The NY Times has had some problems also.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Lemme guess … is the same ’source’ that claimed just before this unlawful >war of aggression, that France had been selling helicopter and fighter >aircraft parts to Iraq ? >I have to laugh.   >{ snip } > I guess this is a lie also? > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/international/europe/30CND-FRAN.htm… > French Court Finds Ex-Minister Guilty of Illegal Party Funding > By ELAINE SCIOLINO

    But what does that have to do with the topic under discussion? (Hint: yes, these guys are a corrupt conservative crowd.  Sounds familiar?)

    Response:

    >>This is the same with the finding of Ossama which may happen in August or >perhaps even October (since he is probably already under custody). > Maybe we should start a pool. I say it happens on September 11, the last day > of the GOP convention in New York City.

    According to the info I can find The Democrats are meeting July 26-29. The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2.

    Response:

    > According to the info I can find > The Democrats are meeting July 26-29. > The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2.

    If the republicans want to be nasty, they would find WMDs right in the middle of the democratic convention, rendering all the pre-prepared speeches useless. Then, just before their convention, they would announce that they have Ossama, to give their party plenty of new energy. It will be interesting to see whether the announcement that they have Ossama will cause the Bush paranoya alert system to go to orange or drop to green. Would they expect retaliation from Al Qaeda, or would they expect that all is finished and there are no longer any threaths ? Dropping to green would be great for election purposes "we’ve brought back security to the USA". On the other hand, Bush knows he gets more support when there are threats. So perhaps just before the election, many air france flights will be cancelled. And now, they have begun to get rid of the world human rights offenses. Yesterday, they released to an undisclosed location the 3 13 year olds that had been kidnapped and kept at the Gantanamo bay concentration camp/kennel. Aren’t there laws about keeping juveniles of that age in prison ?

    Response:

    >> Maybe we should start a pool. I say it happens on September 11, the last day > of the GOP convention in New York City. > According to the info I can find > The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2.

    You’re right. I have heard nothing but non-stop outrage from New Yorker friends and family over the convention supposedly having been moved to Sept 11,  but it turns out that it was just moved _closer_ to Sept 11. miguel — Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The oil ministry papers, described by the independent Baghdad > newspaper al-Mada, are apparently authentic and will become the basis > of an official investigation by the new Iraqi Governing Council, the > Independent reported Wednesday. >"apparently authentic" is the keyword here. With an invading country that is >far from neutral, and with no neutral observers to put credibility to any >findings, such reports must logically be dismissed. >This is the same as the WMDs that they will find in September designed to >bolster Bush Jr,s election prospects. The USA media will not cover any >questioning from oustide the USA about the authenticity of such a find (since >those will have been planted), so the american public will truly believe that >Bush was right and the idiot will get re-elected. >This is the same with the finding of Ossama which may happen in August or >perhaps even October (since he is probably already under custody). >In terms of the oil, there was no secret that many countries had contracts to >operate/fix the oil infrastructure in Iraq, and this includes France. And many >countries were vying for business in Iraq, including France trying to sell >french-made cars to Iraqis. In the fall of 2002, there was a big trade fair in >Bagdhad where many countries participated, trying to sell their wares. And >yes, deals with Iraq were struck with gifts. But this is something that is >very common outside the western world.

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> According to the info I can find > The Democrats are meeting July 26-29. > The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2. >If the republicans want to be nasty, they would find WMDs right in the middle >of the democratic convention, rendering all the pre-prepared speeches useless. >Then, just before their convention, they would announce that they have Ossama, >to give their party plenty of new energy. >It will be interesting to see whether the announcement that they have Ossama >will cause the Bush paranoya alert system to go to orange or drop to green. >Would they expect retaliation from Al Qaeda, or would they expect that all is >finished and there are no longer any threaths ? >Dropping to green would be great for election purposes "we’ve brought back >security to the USA". On the other hand, Bush knows he gets more support when >there are threats. So perhaps just before the election, many air france >flights will be cancelled. >And now, they have begun to get rid of the world human rights offenses. >Yesterday, they released to an undisclosed location the 3 13 year olds that >had been kidnapped and kept at the Gantanamo bay concentration camp/kennel. >Aren’t there laws about keeping juveniles of that age in prison ?

    Response:

    >Lemme guess … is the same ’source’ that claimed just before this unlawful >war of aggression, that France had been selling helicopter and fighter >aircraft parts to Iraq ? >I have to laugh.   >{ snip }

    I guess this is a lie also? http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/international/europe/30CND-FRAN.htm… French Court Finds Ex-Minister Guilty of Illegal Party Funding By ELAINE SCIOLINO PARIS, Jan. 30


  • Jacques Chirac and taking the high moral ground

    Question:

    > >>Lemme guess … is the same ’source’ that claimed just before this >>unlawful war of aggression, that France had been selling helicopter and >>fighter aircraft parts to Iraq ? >>I have to laugh.   > I guess this is a lie also? > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/international/europe/30CND-FRAN.htm… > No you idiot, that’s a finding of a French court.  It’s what we call > ‘reliable’.  Unlike the anti-French, worthy-of-New-York-Post, propaganda > posted to this thread.

    "New York Post Propaganda" I wonder what reporter Alain Hertoghe might say to this assertion…. jay Sat Jan 31, 2004

    Response:

    > "New York Post Propaganda" > I wonder what reporter Alain Hertoghe might say to this assertion….

    I guess that’s indeed where he belongs…

    Response:

    > > "New York Post Propaganda" > I wonder what reporter Alain Hertoghe might say to this assertion…. > I guess that’s indeed where he belongs…

    Alas, it is only the BBC that seems to need replacement staff now. jay Sat Jan 31, 2004

    Response:

    >Alas, it is only the BBC that seems to need replacement staff now. >jay >Sat Jan 31, 2004

    The NY Times has had some problems also.

    Response:

    - Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Lemme guess … is the same ’source’ that claimed just before this unlawful >war of aggression, that France had been selling helicopter and fighter >aircraft parts to Iraq ? >I have to laugh.   >{ snip } > I guess this is a lie also? > http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/international/europe/30CND-FRAN.htm… > French Court Finds Ex-Minister Guilty of Illegal Party Funding > By ELAINE SCIOLINO

    But what does that have to do with the topic under discussion? (Hint: yes, these guys are a corrupt conservative crowd.  Sounds familiar?)

    Response:

    >>This is the same with the finding of Ossama which may happen in August or >perhaps even October (since he is probably already under custody). > Maybe we should start a pool. I say it happens on September 11, the last day > of the GOP convention in New York City.

    According to the info I can find The Democrats are meeting July 26-29. The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2.

    Response:

    > According to the info I can find > The Democrats are meeting July 26-29. > The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2.

    If the republicans want to be nasty, they would find WMDs right in the middle of the democratic convention, rendering all the pre-prepared speeches useless. Then, just before their convention, they would announce that they have Ossama, to give their party plenty of new energy. It will be interesting to see whether the announcement that they have Ossama will cause the Bush paranoya alert system to go to orange or drop to green. Would they expect retaliation from Al Qaeda, or would they expect that all is finished and there are no longer any threaths ? Dropping to green would be great for election purposes "we’ve brought back security to the USA". On the other hand, Bush knows he gets more support when there are threats. So perhaps just before the election, many air france flights will be cancelled. And now, they have begun to get rid of the world human rights offenses. Yesterday, they released to an undisclosed location the 3 13 year olds that had been kidnapped and kept at the Gantanamo bay concentration camp/kennel. Aren’t there laws about keeping juveniles of that age in prison ?

    Response:

    >> Maybe we should start a pool. I say it happens on September 11, the last day > of the GOP convention in New York City. > According to the info I can find > The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2.

    You’re right. I have heard nothing but non-stop outrage from New Yorker friends and family over the convention supposedly having been moved to Sept 11,  but it turns out that it was just moved _closer_ to Sept 11. miguel — Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> The oil ministry papers, described by the independent Baghdad > newspaper al-Mada, are apparently authentic and will become the basis > of an official investigation by the new Iraqi Governing Council, the > Independent reported Wednesday. >"apparently authentic" is the keyword here. With an invading country that is >far from neutral, and with no neutral observers to put credibility to any >findings, such reports must logically be dismissed. >This is the same as the WMDs that they will find in September designed to >bolster Bush Jr,s election prospects. The USA media will not cover any >questioning from oustide the USA about the authenticity of such a find (since >those will have been planted), so the american public will truly believe that >Bush was right and the idiot will get re-elected. >This is the same with the finding of Ossama which may happen in August or >perhaps even October (since he is probably already under custody). >In terms of the oil, there was no secret that many countries had contracts to >operate/fix the oil infrastructure in Iraq, and this includes France. And many >countries were vying for business in Iraq, including France trying to sell >french-made cars to Iraqis. In the fall of 2002, there was a big trade fair in >Bagdhad where many countries participated, trying to sell their wares. And >yes, deals with Iraq were struck with gifts. But this is something that is >very common outside the western world.

    Response:

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> According to the info I can find > The Democrats are meeting July 26-29. > The Republicans are meeting Aug 30 – Sept 2. >If the republicans want to be nasty, they would find WMDs right in the middle >of the democratic convention, rendering all the pre-prepared speeches useless. >Then, just before their convention, they would announce that they have Ossama, >to give their party plenty of new energy. >It will be interesting to see whether the announcement that they have Ossama >will cause the Bush paranoya alert system to go to orange or drop to green. >Would they expect retaliation from Al Qaeda, or would they expect that all is >finished and there are no longer any threaths ? >Dropping to green would be great for election purposes "we’ve brought back >security to the USA". On the other hand, Bush knows he gets more support when >there are threats. So perhaps just before the election, many air france >flights will be cancelled. >And now, they have begun to get rid of the world human rights offenses. >Yesterday, they released to an undisclosed location the 3 13 year olds that >had been kidnapped and kept at the Gantanamo bay concentration camp/kennel. >Aren’t there laws about keeping juveniles of that age in prison ?

    Response:

    >Lemme guess … is the same ’source’ that claimed just before this unlawful >war of aggression, that France had been selling helicopter and fighter >aircraft parts to Iraq ? >I have to laugh.   >{ snip }

    I guess this is a lie also? http://www.nytimes.com/2004/01/30/international/europe/30CND-FRAN.htm… French Court Finds Ex-Minister Guilty of Illegal Party Funding By ELAINE SCIOLINO PARIS, Jan. 30


  • Martin Rees's "Our Final Hour" and Exotic WMD

    Question:

    > Memorandum for the Record > "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at > low energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors > are, in effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will > blow up from time to time. Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place > because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to > which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons.

    Given that the earth’s crust cntains about   10,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg or uranium, or       76,000,000,000,000,000 kg of uranium 235. Thats enough to form many cubic kilometers of U235. So, given that its a nuclear reactor that big, how long till it ‘blows up’? :) Inquiring and scientific minds want to know. Scott

    Response:

    Scott A Crosby included: > Given that the earth’s crust cntains about >   10,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg or uranium …

    10^19 kg? At 0.09 microwatts per kg due its and its daughters’ alpha-decay, that would be 1,000 TW. We wouldn’t have to worry about geothermal power riling the magma monsters, or not so much anyway, because they’d be us. Try 10^(~16.5) kg. See "World Uranium Resources", Deffeyes and MacGregor, Scientific American January 1980. — Graham Cowan http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html — how cars gain nuclear cachet

    Response:

    > Memorandum for the Record > "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low > energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors are, in > effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will > blow up from time to time. >Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place > because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to > which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons. > This stream, having got for any reasons in nuclear reactor, may initiate > explosion of the reactor.

    Astounding that someone who clearly knows so little about nuclear power would chose to talk about it.

    Response:

    > Memorandum for the Record > "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low > energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors are, in > effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will > blow up from time to time. >Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place > because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to > which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons. > This stream, having got for any reasons in nuclear reactor, may initiate > explosion of the reactor.

    yeesh!! it’s the neutrons, not the electrons – an electron is NOT likely to add anything to a nuclear reaction – not enough mass or speed to do any damage!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Astounding that someone who clearly knows so little about nuclear power > would chose to talk about it.

    Response:

    Memorandum for the Record "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors are, in effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will blow up from time to time. Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons. This stream, having got for any reasons in nuclear reactor, may initiate explosion of the reactor. It follows from here that though nuclear stations may provide mankind with cheep energy, atomic energetics represents a very dangerous way of producing energy (as well as the energetics using controlled thermonuclear fusion). The only acceptable way of resolving the energetic problem consists in the use of nuclear reactions at low energies." Excerpt from the Ukrainian paper below. physics research My book "Destiny Matrix" (November 2002 http://www.1stbooks.com & Amazon et-al) discusses the 1999 – 2000 ISSO support of Professor J.P. Vigier’s theoretical physics on "Tight Bound States in Quantum Mechanics" that included a DeBroglie-Bohmian approach to what may be mislabeled "cold fusion". Experimental work on this was done in Beograd by A. Dragic and Z. Maric although there was not any financial support of that work ever by ISSO. See Creon Levit’s note on this for more details in "Destiny Matrix". Astronomer Royal, Cambridge Don, FRS, Sir Martin Rees’s new book "Our Final Hour" (2003) is of broader scope, but it supports some of what I say in "Destiny Matrix" and adds much that I did not say in that book. This work below from Kiev in the Ukraine appears, at least at a first preliminary causal look, to be closely related to Vigier’s theory that also fits in with my own theory of the extended electron with a strong attractive exotic vacuum core /zpf < 0 keeping the spatially extended electron’s electric charge repulsive self-energy stable described in http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc That high 4-momentum transfers in electron scattering show the electron to behave like a point particle < 10^-17 cm is not contradictory to low energy structure with the electron size at the classical radius e^2/mc^2 ~ 1 fermi ~ 10^-13 cm. The Vigier IV Conference in Paris http://www.mindspring.com/~cerebroscopic/ should be interesting in this regard. Curiously Oleinik below is also working on another of my long standing interests superluminal "Tesla" EM waves that may be similar to the EM "X-Wave" work of Waldyr Rodrigues Jr at UNICAMP in Brazil? I have not yet had time to check out this hunch of mine. Jim Corum, previously at SARA then at Senator Robert Byrd’s think tank ISR in West Va was also working in this area of "Tesla" physics with access to the Tesla Archive in Beograd. *Note, I am not by any means endorsing this work. I am merely presenting it for discussion and debate. I have no opinion on its validity at the present time. The work must be considered carefully. These are serious papers, not at all obviously "New Age Cargo Cult" like so many we have seen at ISSO and elsewhere. Knee-jerk debunking of "cold fusion" by Skeptical Inquirer should be avoided on this one. Note also, partially expressed below in the Kiev paper, the idea of a generalized quantum theory of self-organization for OPEN systems not in equilibrium including not in Antony Valentini’s "sub-quantal equilibrium" hence Dick Bierman’s "presponse" i.e. "signal nonlocality". I introduced that idea as early as 1996 as a generalized quantum theory "back-action" "post-quantum theory" at the Tuscon II Conference published in the Abstract Proceedings.  This idea was also published in Volumes 97 and 126 of Kluwer Academic Publishers Series "Fundamental Theories of Physics", i.e. "Beyond Bohm-Vigier Quantum Mechanics" pp. 403 – 410 "Causality and Locality in Modern Physics" Vol 97 (1998) "Progress in Post-Quantum Physics and Unified Field Theory" pp. 419 – 430, "Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale: Proceedings of a Symposium in Honour of the 80th Birthday of Jean-Pierre Vigier" Vol 126 (2002). i.e. [physics/0306073] Information Field and Superluminal Communicationhttp://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306073 Physics, abstract physics/0306073 Information Field and Superluminal Communication Authors: V.P.Oleinik Comments: 14 pages, pdf Subj-class: General Physics "The field of scalar and vector potentials in electrodynamics is shown to represent an informational field capable of superluminally transmitting a signal (information) with no energy and momentum transfer. This conclusion strictly follows from Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetic field interacting with electric charges and currents in vacuum, without resort to any additional hypotheses. That superluminal communication is possible is seen from the fact that the own field, generated by particles and inseparable from them, transforms the environment into a special physical medium which is capable to instantaneously transfer a signal (information) about any changes, happening to a particle in the region of its basic localization, to arbitrarily large distances. The phenomenon of superluminal communication is caused by the non-local connection of scalar and vector potentials with the electric and magnetic field strengths. The basis for the mechanism of superluminal communication considered in this work is the Aharonov-Bohm effect indicative of the field of electromagnetic potentials as a real physical field, which directly influences the behaviour of electron waves. The conclusion is made that in quantum systems superluminal signals occur constantly, in any quantum processes. The occurrence of superluminal signals is due to the space-time symmetry breaking of a special kind, consisting in that the equations for potentials do not possess relativistic invariance though Maxwell’s equations for the field strengths are Lorentz-invariant. The results presented do not contradict the physical principles underlying special relativity and confirm the fundamental conclusion, made for the first time by de Broglie, that gauge invariance is not an absolute law in physics" *A look at Martin Gardner’s 1976 "Magic and Paraphysics" reprinted from MIT Technology Review in "Science, Good, Bad and Bogus", as well as Robert Anton Wilson’s "Cosmic Trigger" shows that the idea of a nonclassical quantum "informational field capable of superluminally transmitting a signal (information) with no energy and momentum transfer." was explicitly an idea I independently introduced into public scientific discussion 30 years ago. BTW Spontaneous broken EM gauge symmetry is essential to the theory of the BCS electrical superconductor.

    [physics/0306072] Physical Mechanism of Nuclear Reactions at Low Energieshttp://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306072 "The physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies caused by spatial extension of electron is considered. Nuclear reactions of this type represent intra-electronic processes, more precisely, the processes occurring inside the area of basic localization of electron." Physics, abstract physics/0306072 Physical Mechanism of Nuclear Reactions at Low Energies Authors: V.P.Oleinik, Yu.D Arepjev Comments: 14 pages, pdf, 2 figures Subj-class: General Physics Journal-ref: New Energy Technologies, 3(6), pp.17-23, (2002) "The physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies caused by spatial extension of electron is considered. Nuclear reactions of this type represent intra-electronic processes, more precisely, the processes occurring inside the area of basic localization of electron. Distinctive characteristics of these processes are defined by interaction of the own field produced by electrically charged matter of electron with free nuclei. Heavy nucleus, appearing inside the area of basic localization of electron, is inevitably deformed because of interaction of protons with the adjoining layers of electronic cloud, which may cause nuclear fission. If there occur "inside" electron two or greater number of light nuclei, an attractive force appears between the nuclei which may result in the fusion of nuclei. The intra-electronic mechanism of nuclear reactions is of a universal character. For its realization it is necessary to have merely a sufficiently intensive stream of free electrons, i.e. heavy electric current, and as long as sufficiently great number of free nuclei. This mechanism may operate only at small energies of translational motion of the centers of mass of nuclei and electron. Because of the existence of simple mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies, nuclear reactor turns out to be an atomic delayed-action bomb which may blow up by virtue of casual reasons, as it has taken place, apparently, in Chernobyl. The use of cold nuclear reactions for production of energy will provide mankind with cheap, practically inexhaustible, and non-polluting energy sources." Selected excerpts: "1. Introduction ‘Tell me what the electron is, and I shall explain to you everything else.’ W. Thomson Nuclear reactions at low energies, occurring in physical and biological systems, and, in particular, the cold fusion (CF) of nuclei, attract ever increasing attention (see review articles [1,2]). This is explained by the fact that research on CF (in what follows, by cold fusion we shall understand any nuclear reactions at low energies) opens up the way to the solution of the problem which was set more than 50 years ago in the field of controlled thermonuclear reactions … read more »

    Response:


  • Martin Rees's "Our Final Hour" and Exotic WMD

    Question:

    > Memorandum for the Record > "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at > low energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors > are, in effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will > blow up from time to time. Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place > because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to > which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons.

    Given that the earth’s crust cntains about   10,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg or uranium, or       76,000,000,000,000,000 kg of uranium 235. Thats enough to form many cubic kilometers of U235. So, given that its a nuclear reactor that big, how long till it ‘blows up’? :) Inquiring and scientific minds want to know. Scott

    Response:

    Scott A Crosby included: > Given that the earth’s crust cntains about >   10,000,000,000,000,000,000 kg or uranium …

    10^19 kg? At 0.09 microwatts per kg due its and its daughters’ alpha-decay, that would be 1,000 TW. We wouldn’t have to worry about geothermal power riling the magma monsters, or not so much anyway, because they’d be us. Try 10^(~16.5) kg. See "World Uranium Resources", Deffeyes and MacGregor, Scientific American January 1980. — Graham Cowan http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/boron_blast.html — how cars gain nuclear cachet

    Response:

    > Memorandum for the Record > "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low > energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors are, in > effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will > blow up from time to time. >Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place > because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to > which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons. > This stream, having got for any reasons in nuclear reactor, may initiate > explosion of the reactor.

    Astounding that someone who clearly knows so little about nuclear power would chose to talk about it.

    Response:

    > Memorandum for the Record > "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low > energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors are, in > effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will > blow up from time to time. >Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place > because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to > which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons. > This stream, having got for any reasons in nuclear reactor, may initiate > explosion of the reactor.

    yeesh!! it’s the neutrons, not the electrons – an electron is NOT likely to add anything to a nuclear reaction – not enough mass or speed to do any damage!! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Astounding that someone who clearly knows so little about nuclear power > would chose to talk about it.

    Response:

    Memorandum for the Record "The existence of simple physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies, indicated in this paper, implies that nuclear reactors are, in effect, nuclear delayed-action bombs which will blow up from time to time. Explosion of nuclear reactor may take place because of casual short circuit at an electric subcircuit, owing to which there appears an intensive stream of free electrons. This stream, having got for any reasons in nuclear reactor, may initiate explosion of the reactor. It follows from here that though nuclear stations may provide mankind with cheep energy, atomic energetics represents a very dangerous way of producing energy (as well as the energetics using controlled thermonuclear fusion). The only acceptable way of resolving the energetic problem consists in the use of nuclear reactions at low energies." Excerpt from the Ukrainian paper below. physics research My book "Destiny Matrix" (November 2002 http://www.1stbooks.com & Amazon et-al) discusses the 1999 – 2000 ISSO support of Professor J.P. Vigier’s theoretical physics on "Tight Bound States in Quantum Mechanics" that included a DeBroglie-Bohmian approach to what may be mislabeled "cold fusion". Experimental work on this was done in Beograd by A. Dragic and Z. Maric although there was not any financial support of that work ever by ISSO. See Creon Levit’s note on this for more details in "Destiny Matrix". Astronomer Royal, Cambridge Don, FRS, Sir Martin Rees’s new book "Our Final Hour" (2003) is of broader scope, but it supports some of what I say in "Destiny Matrix" and adds much that I did not say in that book. This work below from Kiev in the Ukraine appears, at least at a first preliminary causal look, to be closely related to Vigier’s theory that also fits in with my own theory of the extended electron with a strong attractive exotic vacuum core /zpf < 0 keeping the spatially extended electron’s electric charge repulsive self-energy stable described in http://qedcorp.com/APS/Ukraine.doc That high 4-momentum transfers in electron scattering show the electron to behave like a point particle < 10^-17 cm is not contradictory to low energy structure with the electron size at the classical radius e^2/mc^2 ~ 1 fermi ~ 10^-13 cm. The Vigier IV Conference in Paris http://www.mindspring.com/~cerebroscopic/ should be interesting in this regard. Curiously Oleinik below is also working on another of my long standing interests superluminal "Tesla" EM waves that may be similar to the EM "X-Wave" work of Waldyr Rodrigues Jr at UNICAMP in Brazil? I have not yet had time to check out this hunch of mine. Jim Corum, previously at SARA then at Senator Robert Byrd’s think tank ISR in West Va was also working in this area of "Tesla" physics with access to the Tesla Archive in Beograd. *Note, I am not by any means endorsing this work. I am merely presenting it for discussion and debate. I have no opinion on its validity at the present time. The work must be considered carefully. These are serious papers, not at all obviously "New Age Cargo Cult" like so many we have seen at ISSO and elsewhere. Knee-jerk debunking of "cold fusion" by Skeptical Inquirer should be avoided on this one. Note also, partially expressed below in the Kiev paper, the idea of a generalized quantum theory of self-organization for OPEN systems not in equilibrium including not in Antony Valentini’s "sub-quantal equilibrium" hence Dick Bierman’s "presponse" i.e. "signal nonlocality". I introduced that idea as early as 1996 as a generalized quantum theory "back-action" "post-quantum theory" at the Tuscon II Conference published in the Abstract Proceedings.  This idea was also published in Volumes 97 and 126 of Kluwer Academic Publishers Series "Fundamental Theories of Physics", i.e. "Beyond Bohm-Vigier Quantum Mechanics" pp. 403 – 410 "Causality and Locality in Modern Physics" Vol 97 (1998) "Progress in Post-Quantum Physics and Unified Field Theory" pp. 419 – 430, "Gravitation and Cosmology: From the Hubble Radius to the Planck Scale: Proceedings of a Symposium in Honour of the 80th Birthday of Jean-Pierre Vigier" Vol 126 (2002). i.e. [physics/0306073] Information Field and Superluminal Communicationhttp://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306073 Physics, abstract physics/0306073 Information Field and Superluminal Communication Authors: V.P.Oleinik Comments: 14 pages, pdf Subj-class: General Physics "The field of scalar and vector potentials in electrodynamics is shown to represent an informational field capable of superluminally transmitting a signal (information) with no energy and momentum transfer. This conclusion strictly follows from Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetic field interacting with electric charges and currents in vacuum, without resort to any additional hypotheses. That superluminal communication is possible is seen from the fact that the own field, generated by particles and inseparable from them, transforms the environment into a special physical medium which is capable to instantaneously transfer a signal (information) about any changes, happening to a particle in the region of its basic localization, to arbitrarily large distances. The phenomenon of superluminal communication is caused by the non-local connection of scalar and vector potentials with the electric and magnetic field strengths. The basis for the mechanism of superluminal communication considered in this work is the Aharonov-Bohm effect indicative of the field of electromagnetic potentials as a real physical field, which directly influences the behaviour of electron waves. The conclusion is made that in quantum systems superluminal signals occur constantly, in any quantum processes. The occurrence of superluminal signals is due to the space-time symmetry breaking of a special kind, consisting in that the equations for potentials do not possess relativistic invariance though Maxwell’s equations for the field strengths are Lorentz-invariant. The results presented do not contradict the physical principles underlying special relativity and confirm the fundamental conclusion, made for the first time by de Broglie, that gauge invariance is not an absolute law in physics" *A look at Martin Gardner’s 1976 "Magic and Paraphysics" reprinted from MIT Technology Review in "Science, Good, Bad and Bogus", as well as Robert Anton Wilson’s "Cosmic Trigger" shows that the idea of a nonclassical quantum "informational field capable of superluminally transmitting a signal (information) with no energy and momentum transfer." was explicitly an idea I independently introduced into public scientific discussion 30 years ago. BTW Spontaneous broken EM gauge symmetry is essential to the theory of the BCS electrical superconductor.

    [physics/0306072] Physical Mechanism of Nuclear Reactions at Low Energieshttp://www.arxiv.org/abs/physics/0306072 "The physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies caused by spatial extension of electron is considered. Nuclear reactions of this type represent intra-electronic processes, more precisely, the processes occurring inside the area of basic localization of electron." Physics, abstract physics/0306072 Physical Mechanism of Nuclear Reactions at Low Energies Authors: V.P.Oleinik, Yu.D Arepjev Comments: 14 pages, pdf, 2 figures Subj-class: General Physics Journal-ref: New Energy Technologies, 3(6), pp.17-23, (2002) "The physical mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies caused by spatial extension of electron is considered. Nuclear reactions of this type represent intra-electronic processes, more precisely, the processes occurring inside the area of basic localization of electron. Distinctive characteristics of these processes are defined by interaction of the own field produced by electrically charged matter of electron with free nuclei. Heavy nucleus, appearing inside the area of basic localization of electron, is inevitably deformed because of interaction of protons with the adjoining layers of electronic cloud, which may cause nuclear fission. If there occur "inside" electron two or greater number of light nuclei, an attractive force appears between the nuclei which may result in the fusion of nuclei. The intra-electronic mechanism of nuclear reactions is of a universal character. For its realization it is necessary to have merely a sufficiently intensive stream of free electrons, i.e. heavy electric current, and as long as sufficiently great number of free nuclei. This mechanism may operate only at small energies of translational motion of the centers of mass of nuclei and electron. Because of the existence of simple mechanism of nuclear reactions at low energies, nuclear reactor turns out to be an atomic delayed-action bomb which may blow up by virtue of casual reasons, as it has taken place, apparently, in Chernobyl. The use of cold nuclear reactions for production of energy will provide mankind with cheap, practically inexhaustible, and non-polluting energy sources." Selected excerpts: "1. Introduction ‘Tell me what the electron is, and I shall explain to you everything else.’ W. Thomson Nuclear reactions at low energies, occurring in physical and biological systems, and, in particular, the cold fusion (CF) of nuclei, attract ever increasing attention (see review articles [1,2]). This is explained by the fact that research on CF (in what follows, by cold fusion we shall understand any nuclear reactions at low energies) opens up the way to the solution of the problem which was set more than 50 years ago in the field of controlled thermonuclear reactions … read more »

    Response:


  • Home equity loan or refinancing ?

    Question:

    What are the improvements? If they are energy saving improvements such as insulation in the attic, maybe a new energy star furnace, energy star air conditioner, new siding with added insulation if needed this can be financed through some utility companies and low interest rates. Sometimes lower then the current market rate. You can contact your utility company if interested.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by > itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage > AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)? I don’t > know what to do. Please help. Thank You.

    Response:

    Also talk to a mortgage broker – many will offer a lower rate than the bank that they represent – I don’t know why!  Look one up here… http://monstermoving.com/Mortgage_and_Finance/Quotes/ Then check out their reputation here. www.bbb.org – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What are the improvements? If they are energy saving improvements such as > insulation in the attic, maybe a new energy star furnace, energy star air > conditioner, new siding with added insulation if needed this can be financed > through some utility companies and low interest rates. Sometimes lower then > the current market rate. You can contact your utility company if interested. > I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by > itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage > AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)? I don’t > know what to do. Please help. Thank You.

    Response:

    >I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which >will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a >mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by >itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage >AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)?

    Talk to your banker and have them show you the resultant numbers for each option. Dave p.s.  I think I just made "resultant" up.  Is that a real word?

    Response:

    Ah yes. You are absolutely correct Ed. I forgot about the additional 6k he wanted.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Why wouldn’t he qualify for the refinancing? The refinancing lender will > still make plenty of money off the interest for servicing the new loan, > and > of course those ripoff closing costs, right? > He may qualify for re-financing, but will not be able to pull out the $6000 > additional if he does not have equity.  In most cases you can roll the > closing costs into the new loan, but if there is no equity, that may not be > allowed either. > There are banks that will loan 100%+, but the interest is very high compared > to a normal loan. > As I stated, talk to the bank or lending institution.  None of us here can > foresee every circumstance, place a value on the home, etc.  Perhaps if he > can show the extra money is warranted as the value of the home in increased, > they may go for it.  The bank will probably want to work it as a > construction loan until work is completed. > Some questions are better answered locally, not on a newsgroup.  Since the > poster did not give a financial statement, appraisal, copy of the land > survey, etc. how can we give a thorough evaluation? > Ed > http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

    Response:

    It may be wise to refinance if you’ll see a substantial interest savings. Then you can save the CASH to do the home improvment projects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    Response:

    > Why wouldn’t he qualify for the refinancing? The refinancing lender will > still make plenty of money off the interest for servicing the new loan, and > of course those ripoff closing costs, right?

    He may qualify for re-financing, but will not be able to pull out the $6000 additional if he does not have equity.  In most cases you can roll the closing costs into the new loan, but if there is no equity, that may not be allowed either. There are banks that will loan 100%+, but the interest is very high compared to a normal loan. As I stated, talk to the bank or lending institution.  None of us here can foresee every circumstance, place a value on the home, etc.  Perhaps if he can show the extra money is warranted as the value of the home in increased, they may go for it.  The bank will probably want to work it as a construction loan until work is completed. Some questions are better answered locally, not on a newsgroup.  Since the poster did not give a financial statement, appraisal, copy of the land survey, etc. how can we give a thorough evaluation? Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

    Response:

    I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)? I don’t know what to do. Please help. Thank You.

    Response:

    > I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much.

    If your mortgage equal to the size of the loan, you have no equity and will not qualify for either of the loans.  Talk to the bank for best advice. Ed

    Response:

    Why wouldn’t he qualify for the refinancing? The refinancing lender will still make plenty of money off the interest for servicing the new loan, and of course those ripoff closing costs, right?

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much. > If your mortgage equal to the size of the loan, you have no equity and will > not qualify for either of the loans.  Talk to the bank for best advice. > Ed

    Response:


  • Home equity loan or refinancing ?

    Question:

    What are the improvements? If they are energy saving improvements such as insulation in the attic, maybe a new energy star furnace, energy star air conditioner, new siding with added insulation if needed this can be financed through some utility companies and low interest rates. Sometimes lower then the current market rate. You can contact your utility company if interested.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by > itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage > AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)? I don’t > know what to do. Please help. Thank You.

    Response:

    Also talk to a mortgage broker – many will offer a lower rate than the bank that they represent – I don’t know why!  Look one up here… http://monstermoving.com/Mortgage_and_Finance/Quotes/ Then check out their reputation here. www.bbb.org – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What are the improvements? If they are energy saving improvements such as > insulation in the attic, maybe a new energy star furnace, energy star air > conditioner, new siding with added insulation if needed this can be financed > through some utility companies and low interest rates. Sometimes lower then > the current market rate. You can contact your utility company if interested. > I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by > itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage > AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)? I don’t > know what to do. Please help. Thank You.

    Response:

    >I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which >will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a >mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by >itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage >AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)?

    Talk to your banker and have them show you the resultant numbers for each option. Dave p.s.  I think I just made "resultant" up.  Is that a real word?

    Response:

    Ah yes. You are absolutely correct Ed. I forgot about the additional 6k he wanted.

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Why wouldn’t he qualify for the refinancing? The refinancing lender will > still make plenty of money off the interest for servicing the new loan, > and > of course those ripoff closing costs, right? > He may qualify for re-financing, but will not be able to pull out the $6000 > additional if he does not have equity.  In most cases you can roll the > closing costs into the new loan, but if there is no equity, that may not be > allowed either. > There are banks that will loan 100%+, but the interest is very high compared > to a normal loan. > As I stated, talk to the bank or lending institution.  None of us here can > foresee every circumstance, place a value on the home, etc.  Perhaps if he > can show the extra money is warranted as the value of the home in increased, > they may go for it.  The bank will probably want to work it as a > construction loan until work is completed. > Some questions are better answered locally, not on a newsgroup.  Since the > poster did not give a financial statement, appraisal, copy of the land > survey, etc. how can we give a thorough evaluation? > Ed > http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

    Response:

    It may be wise to refinance if you’ll see a substantial interest savings. Then you can save the CASH to do the home improvment projects. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    Response:

    > Why wouldn’t he qualify for the refinancing? The refinancing lender will > still make plenty of money off the interest for servicing the new loan, and > of course those ripoff closing costs, right?

    He may qualify for re-financing, but will not be able to pull out the $6000 additional if he does not have equity.  In most cases you can roll the closing costs into the new loan, but if there is no equity, that may not be allowed either. There are banks that will loan 100%+, but the interest is very high compared to a normal loan. As I stated, talk to the bank or lending institution.  None of us here can foresee every circumstance, place a value on the home, etc.  Perhaps if he can show the extra money is warranted as the value of the home in increased, they may go for it.  The bank will probably want to work it as a construction loan until work is completed. Some questions are better answered locally, not on a newsgroup.  Since the poster did not give a financial statement, appraisal, copy of the land survey, etc. how can we give a thorough evaluation? Ed http://pages.cthome.net/edhome

    Response:

    I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a mortgage for about that much. Should I get a home equity loan by itself? Should I refinance for an amount to pay off the first mortgage AND the home improvement projects (at a lower interest rate)? I don’t know what to do. Please help. Thank You.

    Response:

    > I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much.

    If your mortgage equal to the size of the loan, you have no equity and will not qualify for either of the loans.  Talk to the bank for best advice. Ed

    Response:

    Why wouldn’t he qualify for the refinancing? The refinancing lender will still make plenty of money off the interest for servicing the new loan, and of course those ripoff closing costs, right?

    – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I need to have some home improvement projects done to my home which > will cost me about $5,000 -$7,000 dollars. I have a $64,000 home and a > mortgage for about that much. > If your mortgage equal to the size of the loan, you have no equity and will > not qualify for either of the loans.  Talk to the bank for best advice. > Ed

    Response: